House Bill 2524, and its sister bill in the state senate, 6272, have provisions embedded in otherwise mundane legislative action that are threatening EV sales in Washington.
Clearly, various dealership associations had an influence with the inclusion of provisions that would effectively prohibit Tesla Motors from opening any additional sales or service centers in the state.
Clearly, various dealership associations had an influence with the inclusion of provisions that would effectively prohibit Tesla Motors from opening any additional sales or service centers in the state.
The cross hairs are not just being targeted on the industry-disrupting Tesla, though. The bills also target new EV sales from all manufacturers. If passed in their current forms, HB 2524 and SB 6272 would also require any manufacturer wanting to release a new EV model in the the state to equip ALL of its dealers within the state with specific diagnostic and servicing equipment needed to service the new vehicle.
This would effectively stop any further EV models from being released in Washington State because the high investment costs needed to prepare dealerships to sell and service EVs can only be done on region-by-region basis until there is critical mass adoption for EVs to bring the associated costs down.
![]() |
| Rally Requisite: Pink Sign! |
Late Sunday night, I decided to take my two children on an impromptu 100 mile road trip Monday morning to visit our state's capital in Olympia, and join with other electric vehicle advocates to oppose the legislative action. It was a first-time visit for us, and upon arrival, we were pretty much overwhelmed with excitement!
There was a lot of energy around the state capital on Monday and Tuesday, as 5:00pm on February 18th is the last call for any bills to make it out of their house of origin. So, basically, Olympia is humming with lobbyists and special interests trying to get their final influencing perspective to their legislative representatives--or targets, for the professional lobbyists.
![]() |
| TONS of Teslas...and one LEAF. |
I took the kids outside to try and get our bearings. Then, in unison, the three of us honed in on the legislative building's nearly 300-foot dome across the road from where we stood.
After our brief rally under the rotunda, the advocates dispersed. Some went to legislative offices to try and find a listening ear from a representative's staff. Others, headed into the legislative session to watch a caucus in action. We decided to forgo the lobbying push, and parked it on the marble steps. Just sitting there watching the process, the chaos, was awesome.
![]() |
| The tallest self-supporting masonry dome in the U.S. THAT'S where the action is! |
![]() |
| Inside the legislative building was memorizing for some:) |
After we ate our sandwiches back at the car, I had to figure out how to get us home. I had read about a restricted-access direct-current quick charger (DCQC) being installed in a parking garage somewhere on the capital grounds. After checking some apps on my phone, I had the charger located:
![]() |
| Occupy! |
Looking at the week ahead, we will soon know if our efforts were in vain. If HB 2524 and SB 6272 move on as is, it will not be just Tesla Motors that is at risk of oblivion.
The future of EVs in Washington State hinges on a few specific changes in these legislative actions. If amendments are not made, Tesla will simply be the canary in the coal mine as the remaining EV movement in Washington State will soon follow its death.





No comments:
Post a Comment